“It’s so far away from being an actual voting system you could use in an election. “If that is (DARPA’s) plan, they’re going about it very badly,” said Matt Blaze, a Voting Village organizer and renowned voting security expert. The Democratic Party deepfaked its own chairman to highlight 2020 concerns (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images) Drew Angerer/Getty Images A field of 20 Democratic presidential candidates was split into two groups of 10 for the first debate of the 2020 election, taking place over two nights at Knight Concert Hall of the Adrienne Arsht Center for the Performing Arts of Miami-Dade County, hosted by NBC News, MSNBC, and Telemundo. MIAMI, FLORIDA - JUNE 27: DNC Chairman Tom Perez speaks prior to the start of the second night of the first Democratic presidential debate on Jin Miami, Florida. There’s no bad result here except not doing it.”ĭARPA’s decision to introduce itself into the elections space has rankled some in voting machine business, who fear it represents the start of the government running a process that has historically been the purview of a free market. “If they don’t find anything, that’s OK too. I’d rather find out now,” said the program’s manager, DARPA’s Linton Salmon. The idea is that it’s ultimately safer for anybody to spot potential flaws. The project is open source, meaning its designs are made public. DARPA and its partner on the project, a company called Galois, invited hackers to try to exploit the experimental microprocessor, an essential component for computerized systems that is rarely made in the US. The biggest newcomer this year was the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, the Pentagon agency devoted to emerging technologies, which chose the Voting Village to publicly debut a microprocessor, still a work in progress. Their work has attracted the notice of several lawmakers, who are calling for new legislation to strengthen the integrity of US elections.ĭetractors, often tied to the election industry, say that most of these hacks are impractical in a real-life voting scenario and worry that the event leaves the false impression that US elections are easily exploited at scale. Supporters of the Voting Village say it’s the best way draw attention to problems with an industry that otherwise doesn’t face much public accountability, even in the wake of Russia’s foreign interference in the 2016 election. The hunt for vulnerabilities in US election systems has underscored tensions between the Voting Village organizers, who argue that it’s a valuable exercise, and the manufacturers of voting equipment, who didn’t have a formal presence at the convention. As in the previous two years, they found a host of new flaws. The Def Con Voting Village, a now-annual event at the US’s largest hacking conference, gives hackers free rein to try to break into a wide variety of decommissioned election equipment, some of which is still in use today. The private companies that make the machines America votes on, not so much. At the country’s biggest election security bonanza, the US government is happy to let hackers try to break into its equipment.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |